{"id":14816,"date":"2010-11-16T12:50:43","date_gmt":"2010-11-16T16:50:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/?p=14816"},"modified":"2010-11-16T12:50:43","modified_gmt":"2010-11-16T16:50:43","slug":"jet-roi-japan-times-readers-respond-to-debito-arudous-dont-blame-jet-for-japans-poor-english","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/2010\/11\/16\/jet-roi-japan-times-readers-respond-to-debito-arudous-dont-blame-jet-for-japans-poor-english\/","title":{"rendered":"JET ROI:  Japan Times readers respond to Debito Arudou&#8217;s &#8220;Don&#8217;t Blame JET for Japan&#8217;s Poor English&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Back in September the <em>Japan Times<\/em> ran a column by Debito Arudou titled &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/2010\/09\/08\/jet-roi-dont-blame-jet-for-japans-poor-english\/\">Don&#8217;t Blame JET for Japan&#8217;s Poor English<\/a>.&#8221;\u00a0 The article defended JET against criticism of non-improving English test scores.\u00a0 But it also waded into some generalizations that prompted some thoughtful responses.\u00a0 (Thanks to CLAIR-NY&#8217;s Matt Gillam for the heads up.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/search.japantimes.co.jp\/cgi-bin\/fl20101116hs.html\"><strong>Click here<\/strong><\/a> to see all of the responses.<\/p>\n<h3>The final word on JET, for now<\/h3>\n<p><strong> Arudou misses the mark <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Debito Arudou&#8217;s recent article on the JET (Japan  Exchange and Teaching) Programme (Just Be Cause, Sept. 7) and many of  the responses which followed (Have Your Say, Oct. 12):<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I do agree that there are some systemic challenges  educators must  attempt to overcome in order to provide these kids with  the English  education they deserve. But Mr. Arudou&#8217;s arguments are so   simultaneously inflammatory and reductive that I cannot believe a   reputable publication would venture to publish them.<\/p>\n<p>He is right  to have concerns about the very real  institutionalized handicaps in the  Japanese educational system, but his  ideas are so ill-articulated  (&#8220;Group psychosis?&#8221; Are you kidding?) and,  frankly, ignorant that I  fear the real problems (and solutions) become  lost in the muck.<\/p>\n<p>The  article itself misses the opportunity to shed light  on what is  actually happening in Japanese schools. Mr. Arudou is right  to worry  that cutting the program and withdrawing the significant  foreign  presence in Japan might be counter- productive, but I do not  believe  that that is because the Japanese are suffering from &#8220;eigo  psychosis,&#8221;  whatever that means. The &#8220;problems&#8221; are institutionalized at  this point  \u2014 a reflection of the greater cultural conflict Japan faces  as it  strives to look forward while staying rooted in history and  tradition.<\/p>\n<p>The  push\/pull between The Way Things Have Always Been  Done and<!--more--> the goals  of competitive internationalization is perhaps most  obvious in the  classroom. I teach in a senior high school, and I have  found that the  students are incredibly overworked. In most subjects,  they are not  encouraged to have opinions or speak up in class, which in a  course  that requires participation for effective learning, is  crippling. They  are already ranked and categorized by their supposed  ability and often  made to believe that they are not capable of being  anything more. They  are driven by the need to pass absurd tests that  will determine the  course of the rest of their lives.<\/p>\n<p>Simply put, these kids are  downright exhausted \u2014 and  maybe a little demoralized. As are the  teachers; they are bogged down  with huge amounts of responsibility and  juggle the demands of too many  classes, too many club commitments, and  too much red tape. Both students  and teachers often devote hours a day  just to commuting back and forth  to school, and teachers often shuffle  between multiple schools. With all  the other balls in the air, both the  students and teachers can hardly  be expected to pick up the slack of a  limping foreign language  educational system on their own.<\/p>\n<p>This  is where the benefits of the JET program are  clear. Though the JET  program is not perfect, I do agree with Mr. Arudou  that it is not to  blame for the problems of English education in Japan,  and in fact  alleviates some of the pressure on both students and  teachers.<\/p>\n<p>Still,  his characterization of JET and Japanese schools  misses the mark. The  primary goal of the JET program is indeed to  couple  internationalization with English instruction, but that is not a   &#8220;vague&#8221; goal to those to whom it applies \u2014 it is instead a powerful   mandate to ALTs working across the country. It compels us to not merely   show up to work every day and toss out vocabulary words, but to get   involved in our schools and communities in a substantial way.<\/p>\n<p>We  JETs do not take our purpose lightly, nor do we  treat our time in Japan  as an extended vacation. Perhaps the author of  the comment &#8220;Taking  more than we gave&#8221; forgets that it is not easy to  uproot oneself and  start a new life, alone, halfway across the world \u2014  especially since  many of us are isolated either geographically, socially  or both.<\/p>\n<p>Also,  his or her statement that &#8220;any foreigners . . .  brought to Japan . . .  should be trained and experienced teachers&#8221;  betrays the true meaning  of multiculturalism in education: That  diversity and richness of  experience is what makes truly well-rounded  educators \u2014 not necessarily  a B.A. in education.<\/p>\n<p>Bringing in foreigners with the same  experiences and  education defeats the purpose of bringing them at all.  My experience  with gender studies at the University of Virginia varies  greatly from my  predecessor&#8217;s background as an advocate for children  with special needs  in Australia. And yet, my students have gotten to  know us both, and I  believe wholeheartedly that they have taken away  pieces of those  experiences from us as we give of ourselves in and out  of the classroom.<\/p>\n<p>We can only do so much, of course, but that&#8217;s  all  anyone can do \u2014 and if we are opening one student&#8217;s mind, or  exposing  one Japanese person to a different way of thinking, or taking  home with  us a part of the Japanese spirit, for that matter \u2014 then  we&#8217;ve done our  job and it&#8217;s worth it.<\/p>\n<p>Pushing bold statements  that &#8220;once the fun is over,  however, we wheel the human tape recorder  out of the classroom and get  back to passing tests,&#8221; or that there  exists some sort of &#8220;rent-a-gaijin  phenomenon,&#8221; only betrays the little  victories we fight for in Japan  and makes it harder for anyone to  believe that anything can ever change.<\/p>\n<table style=\"height: 25px;\" border=\"0\" width=\"16\" align=\"right\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back in September the Japan Times ran a column by Debito Arudou titled &#8220;Don&#8217;t Blame JET for Japan&#8217;s Poor English.&#8221;\u00a0 The article defended JET against criticism of non-improving English test scores.\u00a0 But it also waded into some generalizations that prompted some thoughtful responses.\u00a0 (Thanks to CLAIR-NY&#8217;s Matt Gillam for the heads up.) Click here to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[282,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jet-roi","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pkZ7m-3QY","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14816"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14816\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14820,"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14816\/revisions\/14820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jetwit.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}